Have you guys seen this?????

Slagathor · Post by **Slagathor** » Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:05 pm

Early Athlon 64 benchies........

Kicking much Intel booty....

http://www.tbreak.com/forums/showthread ... genumber=1

kuun · Post by **kuun** » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:20 pm

daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaang

and thats just a 2.1GHZ

duuude...

*drool*

Post by **Derek** » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:36 pm

I really don't know what to type..

Really, I mean, look at this post... It's full of nothingness... Well it would be if I wouldn't have typed that I have nothing to type...

See?

Slagathor · Post by **Slagathor** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 5:54 pm

Derek wrote:I really don't know what to type..

Really, I mean, look at this post... It's full of nothingness... Well it would be if I wouldn't have typed that I have nothing to type...

See?

What exactly were you babbling about there good sir????????

Or you a little sore AMD is kicking much intel booty.......

johnli · Post by **johnli** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:00 pm

I would say, without any justification at all (because that's the mood I'm in) that AMD will top the low to mid end consumer processor market in a few years time. Intel will hold the server, laptop and high end workstation market, though the latter will be contested by the opteron.

Post by **Derek** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:47 pm

Slagathor wrote:
Derek wrote:I really don't know what to type..

Really, I mean, look at this post... It's full of nothingness... Well it would be if I wouldn't have typed that I have nothing to type...

See?

What exactly were you babbling about there good sir????????

Or you a little sore AMD is kicking much intel booty.......

Intel > AMD

Check it out: http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articl ... .php?id=91

johnli · Post by **johnli** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:54 pm

And that's why they'll stay on the expensive end of the market and loose out on the home users who don't give a shit about quality processors as long as they're cheap and fast.

Post by **Derek** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:58 pm

johnli wrote:And that's why they'll stay on the expensive end of the market and loose out on the home users who don't give a shit about quality processors as long as they're cheap and fast.

Harsh

HAL6000 · Post by **HAL6000** » Tue Sep 23, 2003 2:19 pm

Derek wrote: Intel > AMD

Check it out: http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articl ... .php?id=91

I have no idea what that says

But in any matter I am looking at a 2.8Ghz P4 with 800 FSB for x-mas. Maybe 3Ghz if the price goes down enough.

Blueneko · Post by **Blueneko** » Tue Sep 23, 2003 2:38 pm

Wait a sec, all intel needs to do is release thier itanium series?

kuun · Post by **kuun** » Tue Sep 23, 2003 5:45 pm

yeah.. and that'll put em back on top.. until AMD releases something better..

it's a constant battle.. neither are better.. just release better cpu's than others at a specific time

Kuun