Heya it works :)
Heya it works :)
actually it works very nice. so stable i can't beleive it. email me if you need any help.
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
Very similar to unix? You arent that familiar w/ unix are you? It _is_ unix. unix comes in different flavors. AT&T and BSD were the first. Linux is also a type of unix. While not identical in operation or in focus, they are all unix. google for 'unix hostory".
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
and as for the tutorial, installing it on a bp6 is no different than any other mobo. making a paper on it would be redundant. groups.google.com is your friend.
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 6:19 pm
- Contact:
Depends what you consider unix to be. By the stricktest definition, it's only Bell Lab's UNIX, the rest are just look/work-alikes. By the most liberal definition even WinNT is unix.m0gely wrote:Very similar to unix? You arent that familiar w/ unix are you? It _is_ unix. unix comes in different flavors. AT&T and BSD were the first. Linux is also a type of unix. While not identical in operation or in focus, they are all unix. google for 'unix hostory".
In all honesty there are two lines of unix that I consider valid, the BSD's and SysV derivatives. Linux is a mish-mash of concepts and really doesn't fit well in either category. Until it's standardized linux will be what GNU admits it to be: a non-unix.
snugglebear is correct. What I meant was more in the direction of the end user experience. However in taking any of these OS's apart you see their origins, which is the *unix* that came from Bell. At some point the modifications to the original make it a different animal. You bring up NT and its' kind of funny. I have read about NT's history before and saw some comments about it and some UNIX infuence. Soon after that I got a funny error installing NT4 one time in the DOS part of the install. it was something to the effect of:
internal hardware error: device /dev/cdrom/
yes this _was_ in NT.
internal hardware error: device /dev/cdrom/
yes this _was_ in NT.
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
http://quake2.telestream.com/
q2 | q3 | counter-strike
-=[ BP6|366's@550@1.95v|512M|30G RAID0|TNT2u|SBLive|Win2K3 ]=-
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 6:19 pm
- Contact:
windows uses the bsd implementation of tcp/ip
also:
su-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD hammerhead.home.lan 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue Jul 12 03:40:14 CEST 2005 root@hammerhead.home.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAMMERHEAD i386
also:
su-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD hammerhead.home.lan 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue Jul 12 03:40:14 CEST 2005 root@hammerhead.home.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAMMERHEAD i386