Dual CPU Via?

Batch codes, RAM specs, BIOS settings, etc..
Post Reply
purrkur
Linux Guru
Posts: 687
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 5:57 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Dual CPU Via?

Post by purrkur »

According to this page at Toms Hardware, VIA will be marketing a dual CPU ITX system in Q2. I personally wouldn't mind a very quiet dual CPU webserver...
2x533MHz@544MHz, 2.0V
640MB PC100 memory
Realtek RTL-8139 NIC
Maxtor 6Y080L0 80GB hdd
Debian Linux stable with 2.4.8 kernel
davd_bob
Confused
Posts: 1043
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 2:30 am
Location: Houston, TX

Post by davd_bob »

Listen to the power of it's silence.
There are *almost* no bad BP6s. There are mostly bad caps.

No BP6s remaining
Athlon 2800
Sempron 2000
ViaCPU laptop with Vista.(Works great after bumping ram to 2Gig)
P-III 850@100
hyperspace
Board Admin
Posts: 1395
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 7:39 am
Location: Lincoln, NE USA
Contact:

Post by hyperspace »

service appliance.
Quantum WormHole

Image
lost in hypertime...
Billl
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 1:52 pm
Location: USA

Re: Dual CPU Via?

Post by Billl »

purrkur wrote:According to this page at Toms Hardware, VIA will be marketing a dual CPU ITX system in Q2. I personally wouldn't mind a very quiet dual CPU webserver...
Well I hope you don't need much performance cause their chips suck! I got a Via C4 1.2 gig (runs at 800) and my old single processor 366 @ 550 will run rings around it.

Just my .02


Billl
purrkur
Linux Guru
Posts: 687
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 5:57 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Dual CPU Via?

Post by purrkur »

Billl wrote:Well I hope you don't need much performance cause their chips suck! I got a Via C4 1.2 gig (runs at 800) and my old single processor 366 @ 550 will run rings around it.
Yeah, I know that. In fact, for desktop usage, a VIA chip running at 1 GHz has been said to have comparable performance to a 500MHz Celeron so you are right on the money.

Desktop usage is a lot more complicated and a lot harder on a CPU than server usage. For example, what makes the VIA chips suck is their floating point performance (calculations) which suck as bad as they did on the K6-2 processors. But when you don't need a powerful ALU (like in many applications running on servers) then these chips are quite allright.
2x533MHz@544MHz, 2.0V
640MB PC100 memory
Realtek RTL-8139 NIC
Maxtor 6Y080L0 80GB hdd
Debian Linux stable with 2.4.8 kernel
Post Reply