1.4 GHz Tualatin Celeron runs, but is unstable in Prime95

Batch codes, RAM specs, BIOS settings, etc..
Post Reply
bdwilcox
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:39 pm

1.4 GHz Tualatin Celeron runs, but is unstable in Prime95

Post by bdwilcox »

I stacked a Tualatin 1.4 GHz Tualatin Celeron on top of an Upgradeware 370GU on top of a Powerleap NeoS370. I tried it in both CPU sockets and with voltages ranging from 1.5 to 1.6 volts. I also tried the RU and RV BIOSes as well as two different sticks of RAM.

In all instances the system boots and runs fine in both Windows 98se and 2000 SP4, but when I try to run the Prime95 Torture Test it runs for about a minute and then fails with a rounding error.

I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this instability with a similar setup and if it possibly relates to the VRMs on my board's revision. I can't find the specific article, but I remember there being some info about bad VRMs on a specific revision of BP-6 boards.

The markings on my board are such:

Back of Board:
V0.41

9935
TEAN TN2 94V-0
FP-236-C41-4B

On ISA slot:
BP6-OKv1.0 937094353-273X
P6 F14 QA
BP6-TAJ004021 MX D

On board near memory slots
3A37 T18

Thanks.
BCN
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 9:50 am
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Contact:

Post by BCN »

try it on lower FSB and not on 100MHz, it might be just your BX cooling, it might be RAM if it is not PC133 or at least PC100. And then of course it might be VRM...
Dual C366@550MHz 1.90V :) (History)
yet single PIII-S 512Kb L2 cache at 1400MHz@700MHz
BP6 (not modded yet)
256MB PC133 C2
GF4Ti4200-8x
Maxtor 2x60Gb - all on promise ATA133
Lite-On LTR 40125S@48125W!!!
Plus P4 system
bdwilcox
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:39 pm

Post by bdwilcox »

I'll try it on 66. It ran rock-solid stable with two Celeron 466s at default speed and voltages, so I know the board is OK as far as "in-spec" usage is concerned.

The northbridge chip has active cooling on it (first thing I did when I got the board) so I doubt that's the problem. RAM is PC133 spec and I have it running at CAS 3 even though its spec'd at CAS 2 at 100 MHz.

I'll run it at 66 and see if it's stable. If not, I guess I can deduce that the VRM or caps are at fault. I've watched Motherboard Monitor and voltage rarely dips below 1.49 V at default 1.5V setting, so I don't know what to make of it.
BCN
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 9:50 am
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Contact:

Post by BCN »

I think it is BX, it is not sufficient in many cases only active cooling when it is at 100+ FSB - then you need an agressive cooling :)
Dual C366@550MHz 1.90V :) (History)
yet single PIII-S 512Kb L2 cache at 1400MHz@700MHz
BP6 (not modded yet)
256MB PC133 C2
GF4Ti4200-8x
Maxtor 2x60Gb - all on promise ATA133
Lite-On LTR 40125S@48125W!!!
Plus P4 system
hyperspace
Board Admin
Posts: 1395
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 7:39 am
Location: Lincoln, NE USA
Contact:

Post by hyperspace »

It could be related to the EC10 capacitor problem.
Quantum WormHole

Image
lost in hypertime...
bdwilcox
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:39 pm

Post by bdwilcox »

EC10 capacitor problem? I've never heard of it before. Could you elaborate on what this problem is? Do you have any information on how to fix it?

In the meantime, I'll also try BCN's recommendation to make sure the adapters are totally mated flush and report back if stability has improved.
hyperspace
Board Admin
Posts: 1395
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 7:39 am
Location: Lincoln, NE USA
Contact:

Post by hyperspace »

Quantum WormHole

Image
lost in hypertime...
bdwilcox
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:39 pm

Post by bdwilcox »

I have a 100uF EC10 cap so that is probably the source of my woe. I don't know how to solder and I don't know anyone who can do soldering this fine. And its just not worth the investment to have a pro do it, especially since it won't guarantee stability. I guess I'll cut my losses and buy a motherboard that can take a Tualatin Celeron 1.4 and eat the cost of the Powerleap and Upgradeware adapters. In the long run it will probably be cheaper and much less risky.
BCN
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 9:50 am
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Contact:

Post by BCN »

would you leave and not climb mount everest only because it seems high enough? :D
Dual C366@550MHz 1.90V :) (History)
yet single PIII-S 512Kb L2 cache at 1400MHz@700MHz
BP6 (not modded yet)
256MB PC133 C2
GF4Ti4200-8x
Maxtor 2x60Gb - all on promise ATA133
Lite-On LTR 40125S@48125W!!!
Plus P4 system
InactiveX
BeOS Forever
Posts: 1385
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 8:25 am
Location: UK

Post by InactiveX »

bdwilcox: It would be a shame to give up on the BP6.

If you do decide to go no further, consider putting it up for sale on Classifieds section of this board.
Like BP6.com? Not a member?
Then why the hell not? It's great!
-> BP6.com Membership <-
Dave Rave
G'Day Mate!
Posts: 894
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 4:28 am
Location: Sydney Australia
Contact:

Post by Dave Rave »

I have 5 bp6 boards, and 4 have the 100uf EC10.
only one of them needed the upgrade to something better, and that one had a damaged 2nd cpu socket, only runs one cpu.
Holodeck2
Modder Extraordinaire
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 12:57 am
Location: Purdue University
Contact:

Post by Holodeck2 »

did someone say agressive cooling?

you're pushing the limits of the board, it wasn't built for this, the engineers didn't think there were people weird enough to try to do this. so, you're gonna have to make some power modifications.
It's like climbing everest with a pickax and sneekers
yea, back from the dead

If it ain't broken, mod it until it is
BCN
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 9:50 am
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Contact:

Post by BCN »

I had no problem with them at 3400m...

though did not have the posibility for higher yet... :)
Dual C366@550MHz 1.90V :) (History)
yet single PIII-S 512Kb L2 cache at 1400MHz@700MHz
BP6 (not modded yet)
256MB PC133 C2
GF4Ti4200-8x
Maxtor 2x60Gb - all on promise ATA133
Lite-On LTR 40125S@48125W!!!
Plus P4 system
Post Reply